Very Important for PCS-J Cases
Compiled by : Roshani Singh, Faculty IAS NEXT
- IPC (Indian Penal Code)
- Kuldeep Kumar Mahato vs. State of Bihar – Rape
- Tukaram v. State of Maharashtra – Mathura Rape Case
- State v. Nalini – Rajeev Gandhi Murder Case
- Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. Emperor – Post Master Murder Case
- State of Maharashtra v. Sukh Deo Singh – General A.S. Vaidya Case
- R. V. Prince – Mens Rea
- Queen V. Tolson – Mens Rea
- Sherras v. De Rutzen – Mens Rea
- UOI v. Rabinder Singh – ‘Dishonestly’ & ‘Fraudulent’ discussed
- Mahboob Shah v. King Emperor – Diff. b/w common intention & similar intention.
- J.M. Desai v. State of Bombay – Principle of joint liability based on common intention.
- R. v. Prince– Mistake of fact
- R. v. Tolson- Mistake of Fact
- Basdev v. State of Pepsu – Self Intoxication
- Mc. Naughten case – Unsoundness of mind
- Jaidev v. State – Right of Private Defence
- Director of Public Prosecution v. Beard – Defence of Intoxication
- Kehar Singh v. Delhi – Criminal Conspiracy
- Nawab Ali v. State of U.P. – Mistake of fact
- Vishwanath v. State of U.P. – Private Defence
- Russel v. Russel – Cruelty
- R. v. Hugging – Vicarious Liability
- P. Rathinam v. UOI – S. 309 of IPC violative of Article 21
- Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab – Attempt to Commit suicide
- Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab – Death Sentence should be awarded in Rarest of rare Cases.
- Prem Shankar v. Delhi Admin. – Right Against handcuffing
- Reg. v. Govinda – Diff. b/w 299 & 300
- K. M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra – Grave & Sudden Provocation.
- R. v. Dudley & Stephen – Necessity
- Laxmi v. UOI – Acid Attack
- Ulla v. King -Leading case on Section 83
- Omkar Prasad Verma v. State of M.P. – Custody
- Rex. V. Levett – Mistake of fact
- Tabu Chetia v. State of Assam – Insanity
- Vijayam v. State of Kerala – Criminal Conspiracy
- State of U.P. v. Virendra Prasad – Murder
- Sarla Mudgal v. UOI – Bigamy
- State of Rajasthan v. Om Prakash– Criminal Attempt
- Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan – Sexual Harassment
- Mithu Singh v. State of Punjab – Sec. 309 of IPC ultravires of Constitution.
- R. v. Goodball – Attempt to do Impossible Act
- Kamlesh Panjiyar v. State of Bihar – Dowry Death
- Kundalabala v. State of A.P. – Dowry Death
- Prem Singh v. State of Haryana- Dacoity
- Sonu Sardar v. State of Chhattisgarh – Dacoity
- Yusuf Abdul Aziz v. State of Bombay – Adultery
- J.M. Desai v. State of Bombay – Criminal Breach of Trust
- V. C. Shukla v. State – Conspiracy
- Suresh Kaushal v. Naz Foundation – S.377 Ultravires
- Nga Tun Kaing case – Child of 12 years Can be convicted of rape in India.
- Navtej Singh Johar vs Union Of India Ministry Of Law And…
- Amish Devgan v. Union of India (2021) – Section 95 trivial nature
- Mohd. Anwar v. State (NCT of Delhi ) ( 2020) – Unsoundness of mind, s 84
- Suraj Jagannath Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra (2020) – Defence of intoxication
- Paul v. State of Kerala (2020) – Voluntary Intoxication, presumption of knowledge
- Rajendra v. State (NCT of Delhi) 2019 – Criminal Conspiracy
- State (NCT of Delhi) v. Shiv Charan Bansal, 2020 – Conspiracy is mostly proved by circumstantial evidence.
- Mala Singh v. State of Haryana, 2019 – SC observed while convicting accused under section 34 when charged under section 149, ‘common intention’ must be proved.
- Arvind Singh v. State of Maharashtra, 2021 – To apply Section 34 common intention must.
- Balvir Singh v. State of M.P., 2019 – To invoke sec 34 common intention by two or more must be proved.
- Chellappa v. State, 2020 – section 34 is not a substantive offence.
- Lakshman Singh v. State of Bihar, 2021 – Rioting
- Girish Singh v. State of Uttrakhand, 2019 – Dowry Death
- State of M.P. v. Kalyan Singh & others. – Attempt to murder, non- compoundable offence.
- State of U.P. v. Faquirey – Exception to section 300
- Anurag Soni v. State of Chhattisgarh, 2019 – Consent on false pretend does not excuse from offence of rape.
- Stalin v. State , 2020 – Nature of injury to cause Murder.
- Gurmeet Singh v. State of Punjab, 2021– words ‘soon before’ does not means ‘immediately before’ under section 304 B
- Shaik Ahmed v. State of Telangana, 2021 – kidnapping for ransom
- Mohd. Rafiq& Kallu v. State of MP., 2021 – Difference between Culpable homicide and Murder
- Phool Singh v. State of MP, 2021 – Rape accused can be convicted on sole testimony of prosecutrix if credible and trustworthy.
- Ganesan v. State, 2021– Dacoity
- Satbir Singh v. State of Haryana, 2021 – Once all essentials of 304B established the presumption under section 113B mandatorily operates
- Satish Chandra Ratalal Shah v. State of Gujarat, 2019 – Cheating
- on 8 January, 2018 On 6th September, 2018 the five-judge Bench partially struck down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, decriminalizing same-sex relations between consenting adults. LGBT individuals are now legally allowed to engage in consensual Intercourse. The Court has upheld provisions in Section 377 that criminalize non-consensual acts or sexual acts performed on animals.
- Joseph Shine vs Union of India on 27 September, 2018 -Section 497 is struck down as unconstitutional Being violative of Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution.
IAS NEXT : BEST PCS-J COACHING IN LUCKNOW