Forest Rights Act, 2006

The Forest Rights Act of 2006, known as the FRA, was meant to address the rights of tribal and traditional forest-dwelling communities. However, it also presented some challenges for the conservation of forests and wildlife. The Act needed to find a balance between the needs of these communities and the protection of our forests and wildlife.

Related Important Articles
Forest Rights Act in India: Essential Info for Forest Dwellers	JPSC Syllabus 2023 for Prelims and Mains, Along with JPSC Exam Pattern
Previous Year Paper: Social Justice	National Parks in India
Previous Year Paper: Indian Society	Previous Year Paper: International Relations

Forest Rights during Colonial Period

The Forest Rights Act of 2006 brought a significant shift in how forests were managed. During the colonial era, the government claimed ownership of all forests, and anyone living off forest resources or near forests were treated as trespassers.
However, in reality, these forest-dwelling communities were not intruders. They had been living in and depending on the forests for generations.
If we look back at the history of people’s rights over forests, it was during the colonial period that they lost many of these rights.

Forest Rights after Independence

After India gained independence, a new National Forest Policy was introduced. Following this, community-driven forest management programs such as Joint Forest Management and Community Forest Management were launched in 1990, emphasizing the active involvement of local people. This was a significant shift from the previous approach.
Prior to these changes, there was a lack of trust in how forests were being managed, and many communities, especially tribal populations in forested areas, felt disconnected from the decision-making process.
Post-independence, many of the country’s forests had suffered from degradation and mismanagement. It was only in the 1990s that the government began to address these issues and consider the rights of local communities to access and utilize forest land and resources.
This struggle for land and resources in the forests has been a prolonged one, as these natural assets are crucial for the livelihoods and survival of these communities.

Basics about Forest Rights Act (FRA)

In December 2006, an important law was enacted.
This law specifically addresses the rights of communities living in forests who have been deprived of their land and resources for many years, mainly due to the outdated colonial-era forest laws in India.
The law officially acknowledges and safeguards the rights of these traditional forest-dwelling communities, aiming to rectify the historical injustices caused by the previous forest laws.

Rights under the Act

Land Ownership for Tribals and Forest Dwellers: Tribals and forest dwellers can own up to 4 hectares of land, but only for the land they are actively farming. No additional land grants are given.
Use Rights for Minor Forest Produce: People in these areas have rights to gather and own minor forest products, like fruits and herbs, as well as access to grazing areas and pastoralist routes.
Relief and Development Rights: If evicted or forcibly displaced, these communities have the right to rehabilitation. They are also entitled to basic amenities, with some restrictions for forest conservation.
Forest Management Rights: These communities have the authority to safeguard forests and wildlife in their regions.

Why Forest Rights Act is needed?

Many of the tribal communities in India struggle with poverty and lack of land ownership. They typically engage in small-scale farming, herding, and nomadic lifestyles. Unfortunately, when it comes to the Human Development Index, states with a significant tribal population consistently score lower than the national average. Recognizing the need to address this issue, the government introduced the Forest Rights Act with the aim of improving their livelihoods. However, even after 15 years, the implementation of this act continues to face numerous challenges.

What are the issues in implementation?

Creating Local Committees for Forest Rights

The law requires the formation of a committee in each village to address forest rights, but this isn’t consistently happening.
Often, these committees are set up hastily by local authorities without proper community involvement.

Opaque Nomination Process for Higher-Level Committees

Committees at higher administrative levels lack transparency in selecting their members.
The rules call for equal participation of women, but this is often overlooked in practice.

Women’s Participation Falls Short

While the law promotes women’s involvement in decision-making, this isn’t always seen on the ground.
Women’s roles in these committees are not as prominent as intended.

Overemphasis on Satellite Images

In some regions, officials insisted on using satellite images as the primary evidence, leading to many claims being rejected.
Other valid forms of proof were often disregarded.

Unequal Access to Welfare Programs

Even after obtaining land rights under the Forest Rights Act, tribal communities don’t consistently receive the same government benefits as others.
The Ministry has issued directives to treat them equally, but this isn’t always followed.

Low Awareness Among Tribal Communities

Many tribal communities, particularly in remote areas, lack awareness of the Forest Rights Act.
Understanding the law and its implementation is crucial for them to assert their rights effectively.

NGO Involvement Disparities

In some areas, like Chhattisgarh, where insurgency is a concern, NGOs are not actively involved.
Implementation tends to be better in regions closer to urban centers or with better accessibility.

Problems faced by Tribals

People in tribal areas are facing challenges with their forest-based livelihoods. The quality of the forest products they rely on is decreasing, pushing them to search for alternative ways to make a living. Their income from activities like collecting tendu leaves for making local cigars has been hit by the arrival of laborers from Bihar who are willing to work for very low wages, especially in places like Chhattisgarh. Additionally, they struggle with a lack of access to good markets and sometimes face exploitation from local traders. Many of them own small, infertile lands, including those recognized under the Forest Rights Act (FRA). To boost their earnings, some migrate to work as laborers in construction or road projects. The youth in these remote areas often receive inadequate education, making it challenging for them to find meaningful employment opportunities.