Uniform Civil Code

These principles are not legally enforceable but are meant to guide the state in making policies.
It has been supported by some as a way to promote national integration and gender justice, but opposed by others as a threat to religious freedom and diversity.
The only state in India that has a UCC is Goa, which retained its common family law known as the Goa Civil Code after it was liberated from Portuguese rule in 1961.
The rest of India follows different personal laws based on their religious or community identity.

Personal Laws in India

Currently, not only Muslims but also Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, Sikhs, Parsis, and Jews are governed by their own personal laws.
The reformed Hindu Personal Law still incorporates certain traditional practices.
Differences arise when Hindus and Muslims marry under the Special Marriage Act, where Hindus continue to be governed by Hindu Personal Law, but Muslims are not.

Diverse Personal Laws and Customary Practices:
India is a country of diverse religions, cultures, and traditions.
Each community has its own set of personal laws and customs that govern civil matters.
These laws and practices vary widely across regions, sects, and groups.
Finding common ground and uniformity among such diversity is very difficult and complex.
Moreover, many personal laws are not codified or documented but are based on oral or written sources that are often ambiguous or contradictory.

Many religious and minority group’s view UCC as an infringement on their religious freedom and cultural autonomy.
They fear that UCC would impose a majoritarian or homogenous law that would disregard their identity and diversity.
They also argue that UCC would violate their constitutional rights under Article 25, which guarantees the freedom of conscience and free profession, practice, and propagation of religion.

There is a lack of political will and consensus among the government, the legislature, the judiciary, and civil society to initiate and implement UCC.
There are also apprehensions that UCC could provoke communal tensions and conflicts in society.

UCC would require a massive exercise of drafting, codifying, harmonizing, and rationalizing the various personal laws and practices in India.
It would require wide consultation and participation of various stakeholders, including religious leaders, legal experts, women’s organizations, etc.
It would also require a robust mechanism of enforcement and awareness to ensure compliance and acceptance of UCC by the people.

UCC would promote national integration and secularism by creating a common identity and sense of belonging among all citizens.
It would also reduce the communal and sectarian conflicts that arise due to different personal laws.
It would uphold the constitutional values of equality, fraternity and dignity for all.

UCC would ensure gender justice and equality by removing the discrimination and oppression faced by women under various personal laws.
It would grant equal rights and status to women in matters of marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, maintenance, etc.
It would also empower women to challenge the patriarchal and regressive practices that violate their fundamental rights.

UCC would simplify and rationalize the legal system by removing the complexities and contradictions of multiple personal laws.
It would harmonise the civil and criminal laws by removing the anomalies and loopholes that arise due to different personal laws.
It would make the law more accessible and understandable for the common people.

UCC would modernise and reform the outdated and regressive practices that are prevalent in some personal laws.
It would eliminate the practices that are against the human rights and values enshrined in the Constitution of India, such as triple talaq, polygamy, child marriage, etc.
It would also accommodate the changing social realities and aspirations of the people.

The Supreme Court upheld the right of a Muslim woman to claim maintenance from her husband under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, even after the expiry of the Iddat period.
It also observed that a UCC would help in removing contradictions based on ideologies.

The Supreme Court held that a Hindu husband cannot convert to Islam and marry another woman without dissolving his first marriage.
It also stated that a UCC would prevent such fraudulent conversions and bigamous marriages.

The Supreme Court declared the practice of triple talaq as unconstitutional and violative of the dignity and equality of Muslim women.
It also recommended that the Parliament should enact a law to regulate Muslim marriages and divorces.

The recommended UCC should reflect India’s multiculturalism and preserve its diversity.
Unity is more important than uniformity.
The Indian Constitution allows for both integrationist and restricted multicultural approaches to accommodate cultural differences.

Also, involving a broad range of stakeholders, including religious leaders, legal experts, and community representatives, in the process of developing and implementing the UCC.
This could help to ensure that the UCC takes into account the diverse perspectives and needs of different groups and that it is seen as fair and legitimate by all citizens.

The Law Commission should aim to eliminate only those practices that do not meet constitutional standards.
Cultural practices must align with substantive equality and gender justice goals.
The Commission should avoid contributing to reactive culturalism among different communities.
The Muslim clergy should lead the reform process of Muslim Personal Law by identifying discriminatory and oppressive issues and considering progressive views.

The Indian Constitution upholds the right to cultural autonomy and aims for cultural accommodation.
Article 29(1) protects the distinctive culture of all citizens.
Muslims need to question whether practices like polygamy and arbitrary unilateral divorce align with their cultural values.
The focus should be on achieving a just code that promotes equality and justice.

Read Also: