According to Section 405:- Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust, or wilfully suffers any other person so to do, commits “criminal breach of trust”.
Explanations
- A person, being an employer of an establishment whether exempted under section 17 of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) or not who deducts the employees’ contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to a Provident Fund or Family Pension Fund established by any law for the time being in force, shall be deemed to have been entrusted with the amount of the contribution so deducted by him and if he makes default in the payment of such contribution to the said Fund in violation of the said law shall be deemed to have dishonestly used the amount of the said contribution in violation of a direction of law as aforesaid.
- A person, being an employer, who deducts the employees contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to the Employees’ State Insurance Fund held and administered by the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation established under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), shall be deemed to have been entrusted with the amount of the contribution so deducted by him and if he makes default in the payment of such contribution to the said Fund in violation of the said Act, shall be deemed to have dishonestly used the amount of the said contribution in violation of a direction of law as aforesaid.
Illustrations
- A, being executor to the will of a deceased person, dishonestly disobeys the law which directs him to divide the effects according to the will, and appropriates them to his own use. A has committed criminal breach of trust.
- A is a warehouse-keeper, Z, going on a journey, entrusts his furniture to A, under a contract that it shall be returned on payment of a stipulated sum for warehouse-room. A dishonestly sells the goods. A has committed criminal breach of trust.
- A, residing in Calcutta, is agent for Z, residing at Delhi. There is an express or implied contract between A and Z, that all sums remitted by Z to A shall be invested by A, according to Z’ direction. Z remits a lakh of rupees to A, with directions to A to invest the same in Company’ paper. A dishonestly disobeys the directions and employs the money in his own business. A has committed criminal breach of trust.
- But if A, in the last illustration, not dishonestly but in good faith, believing that it will be more for Z’ advantage to hold shares in the Bank of Bengal, disobeys Z’ directions, and buys shares in the Bank of Bengal, for Z, instead of buying Company’ paper, here, thought Z should suffer loss, and should be entitled to bring a civil action against A, on account of that loss, yet A, not having acted dishonestly, has not committed criminal breach of trust.
- A, a revenue-officer, is entrusted with public money and is either directed by law, or bound by a contract, express or implied, with the Government, to pay into a certain treasury all the public money which he holds. A dishonestly appropriates the money. A has committed criminal breach of trust.
- A, a carrier, is entrusted by Z with property to be carried by land or by water. A dishonestly misappropriates the property. A has committed criminal breach of trust.
Classification of Offence:-
Offence Description | Punishment provided | Cognizable/Non-Cognizable |
---|---|---|
If by clerk or person employed by deceased. | Imprisonment for 7 years, and fine. | Non-Cognizable |
Bailable/Non-Bailable | Trial Court Details | Compoundable/Non-Compoundable |
Bailable | Magistrate of the first class. | Non-Compoundable |
Compoundable by Whom | Concerned Ministry | Concerned Department |
Non-Compoundable | Ministry of Home Affairs | Department of Internal Security |
405 IPC Case Laws (Supreme Court and High Courts)
Per Lord Haldane in Lake v. Simmons, 1927 ALJ 487 |
C.M. Narayan AIR SC 478 |
Devakinandan (1958) 60 Bom LR 1413 |
Thakarsi AIR 1949 Nag. 620 |
Pushpa Kumar v. State of Sikkim 1978 Cri. LJ 1379 |
Som Nath v. State of Rajasthan 1972 Cri. LJ 897 |
Kundan Tillumal AIR 1942 Kar. 288 |
Dahyalal Dalpatram (1959) 61 Bom LR 885 |
Bimala Charan Roy (1913) 35 All. 361 |
Kesar Singh 1969 (Cri.) LJ 1595 |
M.G. Mohat v. Shivaputrappa and another 1984 Cri. LJ 969 (Kart.) |
Anil Saran v. State of Bihar 1996 Cri. LJ 408 (SC) |
Nirmalabai AIR 1953 Nag. 813 |
Welch’s Case (1846) 1 Den 199 |
Adinarayan Iyer (1907) 17 MLJ 413 |
Pratibha Ram v. Suraj Kumar 1985 Cri. LJ 817 SC |
Kailash Kumar Sanwatia v. State of Bihar 2003 Cri. Lj. 4313 (SC) |
Keshab Chandra Boral v. Ntya Nand Biswas (1901) 6 CWN 203 |
Okhoy Cooman Shaw (1874) 13 Beng LR 307 |
R.K. Dalmia v. Delhi Administration AIR 1962 SC 1821 |
Nemchand Parakh AIR 1938 Mad. 639 |
Kedarnath AIR 1965 All. 233 |
Gurumahanty Appalasamy (1894) 1 Weir 464 |
Jage Ram (1951) 4 Punj. 286 |
Shailendra Nath Mitter (1943) 1 Cal 493 |
Khitish Chandra Deb Roy (1924) 51 Cal 796 |
Madho Singh v. Kamala Devi 1992 Cri. LJ 1858 (Bom) |
Balram Singh v. Sukhwant Kaur 1992 Cri. LJ 792 (P7 H) |
Employees State Insurance Corporation v. S.K. Aggarwal AIR 1998 SC 2676 |
FAQs on Section 405 of the Indian Penal Code:
Section 405 of the IPC deals with the offense of “Criminal Breach of Trust.” It states that whoever, being entrusted with property or having dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts it for their own use, or violates any legal contract or direction of law related to the discharge of such trust, commits criminal breach of trust.
The essential elements of the offense under Section 405 IPC are:
a. The accused must be entrusted with property or have dominion over it. b. The accused must have dishonestly misappropriated, converted, or used the property in violation of any legal direction or contract related to the trust. c. The act must be done without the consent of the owner of the property.
Any person who is entrusted with property or has dominion over property can be charged under Section 405 IPC if they dishonestly misappropriate or use the property for their own benefit, against the prescribed legal directions or contract.
The punishment for an offense under Section 405 IPC is imprisonment for up to 7 years and a fine.
Read also:- IPC Section 392: Punishment for Robbery